A .NET Core/Standard Versioning Odyssey
While creating my first binary PowerShell module, which just happened to also be my first .NET Core/Standard project, I ran into trouble trying to set the assembly version info on the DLL.
PS C:\> ls SelectXmlExtensions.dll |% VersionInfo ProductVersion FileVersion FileName -------------- ----------- -------- SelectXmlExtensions.dll
The aborted xproj / project.json formats for early .NET Core versions polluted my search results. Those also meant that I’d have to be pretty careful about how recent any proposed solutions were, particularly since I was using the .NET Core SDK 3.0. But how old was too old?
I found SDK issues #967 and #1098, and I tried the whole version prefix & suffix thing, updating
my fsproj with
<VersionPrefix>1.0.0</VersionPrefix> and ran
dotnet build --version-suffix beta, but
despite being the most up-to-date info, this didn’t work.
Sometimes Microsoft does a great job of documenting stuff that won’t be released for some time, so maybe
I had to watch out for info that was too new, as well.
I found more suggestions, so I added
<Version>1.0.0</Version> to my fsproj and rebuilt,
/p:AssemblyVersion=1.0.0 to the command line and rebuilt, and nothing worked.
I tried creating a Directory.Build.props
I even tried creating an AssemblyInfo.fs file which I hadn’t done by hand for a while, and added
<Compile Include="Properties\AssemblyInfo.fs" />
to the fsproj and tried again, but nothing changed.
<Project> <PropertyGroup> <GenerateAssemblyInfo>false</GenerateAssemblyInfo> </PropertyGroup> </Project>
namespace SelectXmlExtensions open System.Reflection open System.Runtime.CompilerServices open System.Runtime.InteropServices [<assembly: AssemblyVersion("220.127.116.11")>] [<assembly: AssemblyFileVersion("18.104.22.168")>] do()
What was really puzzling me was that it seemed like the people getting these answers were successful, but they were probably using a different version of the tools than I was. Sometimes I would find unanswered questions, so maybe I wasn’t alone with this problem.
I’d gradually built a pretty decent script for rerunning clean builds, though.
I found a what seemed to be a pretty definitive article on all of this, but it didn’t help either.
I decided that I’d made a pretty thorough effort, so I filed an issue. I was a little surprised when a fix was promised in .NET Core 3.1. It made me wonder if I could use an older feature of an older .NET Core toolset to work around the problem while I waited for the fix.
I uninstalled the .NET Core SDK 3.0.100, then installed 2.2.402, and even 2.1.802, but it didn’t seem to be a problem with the version of the tooling. One or more of these methods should have worked in 2.x.
Then I decided to try one more thing.
It didn’t work. But now I know that I’ll have to wait for a fix, or manually add version info with some kind of external tool.
C:\temp> pushd (mkdir LibCS).FullName C:\temp\LibCS> dotnet new sln The template "Solution File" was created successfully. C:\temp\LibCS> dotnet new classlib The template "Class library" was created successfully. Processing post-creation actions... Restore completed in 194.91 ms for C:\temp\LibCS\LibCS.csproj. Restore succeeded. C:\temp\LibCS> dotnet sln add LibCS.csproj Project `LibCS.csproj` added to the solution. Microsoft (R) Build Engine version 16.3.0+0f4c62fea for .NET Core Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Restore completed in 27.99 ms for C:\temp\LibCS\LibCS.csproj. LibCS -> C:\temp\LibCS\bin\Debug\netstandard2.0\LibCS.dll LibCS -> C:\temp\LibCS\bin\Debug\netstandard2.0\publish\ C:\temp\LibCS> (ls -r -fi LibCS.dll).VersionInfo ProductVersion FileVersion FileName -------------- ----------- -------- 1.0.0 22.214.171.124 C:\temp\LibCS\bin\Debug\netstandard2.0\LibCS.dll 1.0.0 126.96.36.199 C:\temp\LibCS\bin\Debug\netstandard2.0\publish\LibCS.dll 1.0.0 188.8.131.52 C:\temp\LibCS\obj\Debug\netstandard2.0\LibCS.dll C:\temp\LibCS> popd C:\temp> pushd (mkdir LibFS).FullName C:\temp\LibFS> dotnet new sln The template "Solution File" was created successfully. C:\temp\LibFS> dotnet new classlib -lang 'F#' The template "Class library" was created successfully. Processing post-creation actions... Running 'dotnet restore' on C:\temp\LibFS\LibFS.fsproj... Restore completed in 210.12 ms for C:\temp\LibFS\LibFS.fsproj. Restore succeeded. C:\temp\LibFS> dotnet sln add LibFS.fsproj Project `LibFS.fsproj` added to the solution. C:\temp\LibFS> dotnet publish Microsoft (R) Build Engine version 16.3.0+0f4c62fea for .NET Core Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Restore completed in 45.47 ms for C:\temp\LibFS\LibFS.fsproj. LibFS -> C:\temp\LibFS\bin\Debug\netstandard2.0\LibFS.dll LibFS -> C:\temp\LibFS\bin\Debug\netstandard2.0\publish\ C:\temp\LibFS> (ls -r -fi LibFS.dll).VersionInfo ProductVersion FileVersion FileName -------------- ----------- -------- C:\temp\LibFS\bin\Debug\netstandard2.0\LibFS.dll C:\temp\LibFS\bin\Debug\netstandard2.0\publish\LibFS.dll C:\temp\LibFS\obj\Debug\netstandard2.0\LibFS.dll
With this broken for so long, on top of the lack of F# support in tools like Add-Type and xsd.exe, Microsoft has to earn back a lot of credibility before claiming F# as a first-class language with full support again.